:focal(0x0:3000x2000)/static.texastribune.org/media/files/62fb97f84018749a4c9c5149ba0f9478/0209%20Delta%208%20Products%20SF%20TT%2029.jpg)
What Happened
On June 22, 2025, Texas Governor Greg Abbott vetoed Senate Bill 3, which aimed to impose a comprehensive ban on consumable hemp products containing any form of THC, including delta-8 and delta-9. This decision came just minutes before the deadline for the veto and was followed by Abbott calling for a special legislative session to discuss a regulatory framework for THC products instead. The veto has significant implications for the Texas hemp industry, which has grown substantially since the legalization of hemp products in 2019.
The veto has sparked a political rift between Abbott and Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, who had prioritized the ban as one of his top legislative goals. Patrick expressed his disappointment publicly, arguing that the veto would leave families and law enforcement feeling neglected in their efforts to combat the dangers of high-potency THC products. Abbott, in his statement, emphasized the need for a regulatory approach that would align with federal law and protect public safety, particularly for minors.
Key Details
- Senate Bill 3: Proposed a total ban on consumable hemp products containing THC. It was passed by the Texas Legislature but faced opposition from various groups, including the hemp industry and some conservative activists.
- Governor’s Veto: Abbott vetoed the bill, citing concerns over its constitutionality and potential legal challenges that could arise from a total ban. He argued that the bill would not effectively address public safety issues and could lead to further complications in the legal landscape.
- Special Legislative Session: Following the veto, Abbott called for a special session beginning July 21, 2025, to discuss regulatory measures for THC products. He suggested regulations similar to those governing alcohol, including restrictions on sales to minors and enhanced law enforcement funding.
- Political Reactions: Patrick criticized Abbott’s decision, claiming it would leave vulnerable populations unprotected. Supporters of the veto, including members of the Texas Hemp Business Council, praised Abbott for prioritizing a regulatory approach over a ban.
Multiple Perspectives
The veto has generated a range of responses from various stakeholders:
-
Supporters of the Veto: Advocates for the hemp industry, including some veterans and farmers, argue that consumable hemp products have provided relief for chronic pain and other conditions, allowing them to avoid more harmful substances like opioids. They contend that a ban would harm the industry and limit access to beneficial products.
-
Opponents of THC Products: Critics, including Patrick and other proponents of the ban, argue that high-potency THC products pose significant risks to public health, particularly for young people. They believe that a full prohibition is necessary to protect vulnerable populations from potential harm.
-
Political Analysts: Some analysts suggest that Abbott’s veto may be a strategic move to appeal to a broader constituency, as opposition to the ban came from across the political spectrum. However, it also places him in direct conflict with Patrick, a prominent figure within the Republican Party in Texas.
Context & Background
The debate over THC regulation in Texas has been ongoing since the 2018 federal Farm Bill legalized hemp products, leading to a significant increase in the availability of hemp-derived THC products across the state. The 2019 Texas law that legalized these products inadvertently created a loophole, allowing for the proliferation of over 8,000 retailers selling THC-infused edibles, vapes, and other products. This rapid growth has raised concerns among lawmakers and public health advocates about the safety and regulation of these products.
The political landscape surrounding THC regulation is complex, with Abbott and Patrick representing different factions within the Texas Republican Party. Abbott’s call for a regulatory framework reflects a desire to balance public safety with the economic interests of the burgeoning hemp industry, while Patrick’s push for a ban highlights a more conservative approach focused on immediate public health concerns.
What We Don’t Know Yet
As of now, it remains uncertain how the upcoming special legislative session will unfold and what specific regulations will be proposed for THC products. The political dynamics between Abbott and Patrick could influence the outcome, as both leaders have significant support within the Texas legislature. Additionally, the long-term implications of Abbott’s veto on the hemp industry and public health remain to be seen, particularly as stakeholders continue to advocate for their respective positions. The effectiveness of any new regulations in addressing safety concerns while supporting the industry will also be a critical area to watch in the coming months.
