news

Iran Issues Statement on Retaliation Against Israel

Iran vows retaliation following Israel's 'Operation Rising Lion,' a major military strike on its nuclear facilities, escalating regional tensions.

Balance News Editorial Team
Iran Issues Statement on Retaliation Against Israel

What Happened

On June 13, 2025, Israel launched a significant military operation targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities and military leadership, marking a dramatic escalation in tensions between the two nations. The operation, dubbed “Operation Rising Lion,” involved over 200 Israeli fighter jets and aimed at key sites within Iran, including the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility. The strikes resulted in the deaths of several high-ranking Iranian military officials, including Major General Mohammad Bagheri, the chief of staff of Iran’s armed forces, and General Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

In response, Iran initiated a counter-offensive, launching more than 100 drones towards Israeli territory. The Israeli military reported that their defense systems were actively intercepting these threats. Iranian officials condemned the Israeli strikes, asserting that they would retaliate decisively, with threats directed at both Israel and the United States, which Iran accused of complicity in the attacks.

Key Details

  • Israeli Strikes: The operation involved 200 fighter jets and targeted over 100 locations, including military and nuclear sites. The strikes were described as unprecedented in scale and coordination.
  • Casualties: The strikes resulted in the deaths of Major General Mohammad Bagheri, General Hossein Salami, and several other military leaders and nuclear scientists.
  • Iranian Response: Iran launched over 100 drones towards Israel, signaling a commitment to retaliate. Iranian military officials stated that both Israel and the U.S. would face severe consequences.
  • International Reactions: Countries such as Saudi Arabia condemned the Israeli actions, calling them a violation of international law. The U.S. stated it had no involvement in the strikes, emphasizing its priority of protecting American forces in the region.

Multiple Perspectives

The Israeli government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, justified the strikes as necessary to prevent Iran from advancing its nuclear capabilities, which they argue could lead to the development of nuclear weapons. Netanyahu characterized the operation as a preemptive measure to ensure regional security.

Conversely, Iranian officials have framed the strikes as an act of aggression and a violation of their sovereignty. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned that Israel should “expect severe punishment” for the attacks. The Iranian Foreign Ministry accused the U.S. of facilitating the Israeli strikes, asserting that such actions could not have occurred without American support.

Internationally, reactions have varied. While some nations, like Saudi Arabia, condemned the strikes, others, including the U.S., distanced themselves from the operation, emphasizing the need for diplomatic solutions to ongoing tensions. Analysts have noted that the deaths of key Iranian military leaders could complicate Iran’s ability to respond effectively.

Context & Background

The Israeli-Iranian conflict has deep historical roots, primarily revolving around Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its support for militant groups opposed to Israel. Israel has long viewed Iran’s nuclear program as a direct threat, leading to a series of covert operations and military actions aimed at curbing Iran’s capabilities. The 2015 nuclear deal, which limited Iran’s uranium enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief, was a focal point of contention, especially after the U.S. withdrawal from the agreement in 2018 under President Donald Trump.

In recent years, tensions have escalated due to Iran’s increased uranium enrichment activities, which have raised alarms among Western powers. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reported that Iran has breached its nuclear obligations, further complicating diplomatic efforts.

The current military escalation comes at a time when U.S.-Iran negotiations were reportedly underway, raising questions about the timing and strategic calculations behind Israel’s actions.

What We Don’t Know Yet

As the situation continues to unfold, several uncertainties remain. The full extent of the damage caused by the Israeli strikes is still being assessed, particularly concerning casualties and the operational status of Iran’s nuclear program. Additionally, the effectiveness of Iran’s retaliatory measures and the potential for further escalation in the region are unclear.

The international community’s response to the escalating conflict will also be critical. It remains to be seen whether diplomatic efforts can be revived in light of the recent military actions, or if this will lead to a prolonged cycle of retaliation and violence. Furthermore, the internal dynamics within Iran, especially following the loss of key military leaders, could influence the country’s strategic decisions moving forward.

Source: This article is based on reporting from original source

You Might Also Be Interested In